Skip to main content

How have we changed our definition of the comic form over time.

Comics have been around since the cave paintings of the cavemen. The paintings told stories without any words. They would draw pictures of previous hunts or seasons that had dramatic influences on their society. This is one fact that I never knew. I always thought that comics were invented about 100 years ago not during the cavemen era. Reading this in “Understanding Comics” blew my mind. When Scott McCloud mentioned the Egyptians and comics, I was in awe. I thought that this was pretty cool. As time went on, so did the definition of comics. Stories told by pictures stayed but the use of words soon came to be. During the colonial period, comics began to have words. The words weren’t “comic words” that we would think of now, they were full sentences with a picture. The use of these words, such as “BAM” and “ZAM”, weren’t used until about the 1940’s. The first comic during the 1800’s was the yellow kid. It was just a kid that had a yellow shirt on with writing on his shirt. The comic would tell the story by writing different sentences on his shirt. The colonial period’s comics on the picture plane would be very far left towards reality. They were very accurate pictures with only sentences. They were nothing compared to the comics we read today. Towards the 1920’s, comic books that we think of now were coming around. In 1938, superman came to be and people were a little sketched out by a man that could lift up cars. No one had ever seen something like this before but people warmed up to it. From the caveman drawings to the first “real” comic, superman, the comic definition changed completely. The picture plane went from far left to far right to in the middle. Recently, in the New York Times it was announced that the comic companies are going to be changing up the characters and stories a little. So what does that mean for the picture plane? Guess we will have to wait and see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...