Skip to main content

How have we changed our definition of the comic form over time?

While the comic (as we know it today) might be a fairly 20th century invention, comics have existed for thousands of years. Whether in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, cave paintings in Lascaux, France, or Victorian England, the comic has continued to evolve. In today's society, frames, gutters, word bubbles, icons, symbols, etc. have become the basis for constructing comics.

While the basic construction is the same, comics have evolved from their cave painting ancestors. Cave paintings and early "comics" were focused on depicting rituals, hunts, etc. However, what these early comics and modern comics have in common is the very basis of Scott McCloud's definition of comics: "juxtaposed pictorial[s] and other images in deliberate sequence." In addition to the very definition of the comic medium, the idea of preserving history in words and pictures has continued.

Each comic demonstrates a different segment of history: social, economic, cultural, etc. Whether it be drug use in the 1970's (Green Lantern and Green Arrow), racial inequality in the 60's, greed in the 30's, or hunting Mammoths in prehistoric time, comics have always depicted some aspect of life that becomes part of a written history.

Another change in the evolution of comics is the interaction between words and pictures. In early comics, there were no words, and when they were included in later centuries, the two were separate pieces. In modern comics, the words and pictures are interchangeable. Comics live and die off of the story and art. Without great art, a comic is a novel. Without a great story, the comic is a picture book. Comics artists and writers maximize meaning by deciding the role of a word bubble or an onomatopoeia in electric colors and designs, or the size and shape of a panel, or the construction of the closure between panels. Comics have become as much about the gutter as they have about the actual panels themselves.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle&
2 comments
Read more

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.
2 comments
Read more

#FUTURES: Tomorrow Idris Elba will be the Last Man Standing

There is some bad buzz around Pacific Rim on the web. I suspect the possibility of a giant robot movie being awesome is too much for some people.  The internet is full of dark corners, but until we see the movie we won't know the box office.  What we can tell right now is that Idris Elba is doing his part to make the movie a success. A standout performer, Elba has made a name for himself in countless productions .  He achieve wide recognition for his turn on the big screen in films such as Thor and on the small screen in the BBC's Luther . Of course, the open question about actors of color in any film is whether not they will help or hurt the box office.  Will Smith recent disappointment with After Earth opens the door for this conversation. His lack of success sparks the question who will be the next "bankable" star of color. There can be only one! See what I did there:-)  These sentiments reflect a Hollywood centric approach that ignores Nollywood
Post a Comment
Read more