Skip to main content

How have we changed our definition of the comic form over time?

At its essence, I believe our definition of the actual comic form has changed very little over time. Whether dime novels or pulp fictions or comic books and strips, the image that comes to mind is a story, typically told through both text and picture, that depicts a hero struggling against the greatest fears of contemporary society. While artistic styles, color technology, and even the icons used to depict these stories may change over time, the iconic format of the comic itself remains the same. What changes is the message portrayed though the story. This message always speaks to what society's greatest fear is, as it is this fear that the hero must struggle against and, inevitably, overcome. In America, the comic form has a history of presenting the national ideal of an individual and upholding what are viewed as societal values and identities. These then overcome any perceived threats to this national self-image, threats which change depending on the time.

In terms of content, the comic form was first found among the dime novels, the country was undergoing rapid urbanization in the post-Civil War era, and the western frontier was nearly, if not already, extinct. The sense of American identity, which to that point had been inseparable from "Manifest Destiny", underwent an identity crisis. Along with this closing of the frontier came urbanization and a massive influx of immigration. Many people feared that these things would combine to degrade civilization and the American way of life. In answer to this was the dime novels of popular culture, which often featured men who were the best of what society had to offer overcoming adverse conditions or enemies to behave in a way representative of American virtues. When the Great Depression introduced into the common mind the idea that living according to these virtues might not be enough to succeed for normal humans, superheroes were introduced as the more-than-ordinary individuals required to overcome the days adversity. Thus, the identity of the modern comic was born.

While the evolution of how the content of comics formed plays a key role in the view of comics today, the development of the physical format is equally important. Comic books emerged from the hybridization of comic strips and pulp fiction. While pulp fiction may have provided the basis for the fantastical stories, the comic strips are what gave rise to the combination of text and illustrations in sequential panels to tell a tale. Comic strips originated as weekly installments used to attract readers. Then they began to be issued in a compilation book format. Eventually, publishers began seeking new materials to sell in the books, not just reprints of old comics. Taking the idea material from pulp fiction, they applied to formatting of the comic strips. In this way, comic books in their familiar format developed.

Comments

J Chambliss said…
I think you have touched on a key point. Does the medium change or the message. At some level, scholars argue that comics are merely the current form of communal narrative. These stories have not changed, merely the means to tell them.

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...