Skip to main content

Finally! We covered the X-Men... but where was Gambit?


While Days of Future Past was a fantastic read, my one critique would be the absence of my favorite X-Man Remy LeBeau, better known as Gambit. This is also my complaint about the X-Men films by 20th Century Fox. I don't mean to rant, but how does a child whose mutant ability is to change television channels make it on screen and not our favorite French, kinetic energy manipulating, thief Gambit not? (Yes, I did see his name on the computer in X2).

But I digress... I enjoyed Days of Future Past because I really love the Sentinels. Part of it has to do with growing up watching the X-Men cartoon and seeing moments like Cyclops blasting a Sentinel's head off or Wolverine using his claws to climb up the robot's back to then hack away at its neck. Reading about the Sentinels and their mission to control mutants and humans into concentration camps really spoke to me. At one point in the X-Men story, after the Sentinels are starting to take over, Trask says to Master Mold...

"You were supposed to protect humans from mutants!"
To which Master Mold replies, "That is not logical; mutants are humans. Therefore, humans must be protected from themselves." Trask is left speechless.

This line is from the animated series of the early 1990s instead of from the comics, but it has always stayed with me over the years. Statements like Master Mold's raises the deep question, what does it mean to be human?

Comments

Brad T said…
I miss the old cartoon show. I have fond memories of the X-Men battling the sentinels. I was impressed with the show's bravery in killing off an X-man in the first episode. Remember poor Morph?
April 3, 2008 at 6:20 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.
2 comments
Read more

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...
1 comment
Read more