Skip to main content

Copyright

Copyright. During class on Monday we discussed a few reasons why a writer may want to copyright the work he or she has created. Some of the reasons we mentioned included copyrighting in order to claim a creation as someone’s own. This could be done for various reasons: the creator takes pride in his or her work and wants to claim it as solely his or hers, he or she wants to deter other people from stealing his or her idea for the creation, and lastly, copyrighting was created in order for writers (or other designers of works) to make lots of money from the creation. In most cases, I would agree that people want to copyright in order to make money, but one should not forget that it costs money to register a copyright for a creation. Thus, the profit of that piece of work must exceed its cost in order for the creator to make any money. Next, I also believe that someone may want to copyright his or her work in order to avoid other people from stealing his ideas. However, one thing to consider is that a copyright does not cover the idea or the information itself; it only covers the form in which those ideas are expressed. Thus, an outsider can still take the idea and express it in a different form and it will not be considered stolen from the original work. The concept of copyrights has led to greater competition between creators, writers in particular. While copyrights have made it impossible to steal or build on someone else’s work, it forced people to come up with ideas for new creations. The constructing of new creations thus led to more competition within industries and kept the creation of original works fair between writers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Comics Ch. 1-2 & Comic Book Nation Ch.1

To begin with, I really do like the idea of reading a comic about comics. I think it's a great idea and it's very well executed. As I was reading the first two chapters, I was surprised at how many examples there were of art in recent (and ancient, in some cases) history that are variations of "sequential visual art" and thus the foundations of modern comics. I'd never even thought about it before and it was hard to believe how many different kinds there were. I also love all the discussion about how our human brains automatically interpret certain images in a specific way, how we see others constantly but we identify ourselves when we look at cartoons, and how inanimate objects automatically becomes extensions of our bodies. The pyramid of styles was very interesting too as a way to conceptualize and almost graph or "place" a specific art style in comics. In Comic Book Nation , I enjoyed reading about the evolution of early comics from "funnies...

MegaCon 2011 Mobile Blog Entry

Next up, the Crime Noir Panel hosted by The Rack Pack Comic Podcast . Jimmy Palmiotti, Frank Tieri, Darwyn Cook and Dave Johnson are the speakers. MegaCon has matured as the comic industry has grown in importance in popular culture. Orlando's native convention should be attracting this kind of top talents and now it seem to be doing it.

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.