Skip to main content

Alexander the Great





I thought it was interesting in Chapter XI page 8 of Watchmen that Adrian Veidt claimed Alexander the Great as his hero. A notable historic figure who had the same hero was Napoleon Bonaparte. It also seems notable that Alexander the Great’s hero was Achilles.

Related to Adrian Veidt’s proclamation of his hero, he mentions that he admired how Alexander the Great had conquered the civilized world and managed to rule “without barbarism!” On the surface it seems Adrian Veidt is trying to say he wants to create a world without war- a civilized, peaceful world. It seems that his vision is to bring “an age of illumination to a benighted world” (benighted meaning dark and unenlightened). It is somewhat ironic, however, if you take the Greek meaning of the term (Alexander the Great was Greek after all). In Greek “barbarian” refers to anyone who is not Greek, who does not speak the Greek language. The way Alexander made the world “non-barbaric” was by spreading the Greek culture and Greek language to the conquered lands. I suppose, however, in essence, both Adrian Veidt and Alexander the Great accomplished the same feat of unifying the known world- despite their differing definitions of “barbarism”.


Though Adrian Veidt recognizes that Alexander the Great’s empire did not “survive him,” he doesn’t seem to recognize why. It is generally agreed that the empire broke down because Alexander the Great died without consolidating his power and without providing an heir to take over. With his death a huge power vacuum was created which no individual person could fill, so the empire was split up between his Generals. It seems reasonable to speculate that the unified world Adrian Veidt has created can very well have a similar fate. Once the threat of an alien invasion, a common enemy, is realized to be non-existent, what will happen? What will happen when Adrian Veidt’s influence over the world that binds them together is gone? The most obvious answer is that, like Alexander the Great’s empire, the world will split up into factions against each other.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.
2 comments
Read more

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...
1 comment
Read more

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...
Post a Comment
Read more