Skip to main content

Superman has robots…who knew?

In the comic "The Last Days of Superman” we read about a dying Superman seemed very hokey and so unrealistic. Superman has robots…who knew? Why would he need robots in the first place? Also, I thought Superman was a very American hero, mainly focused on the city, so why is he taking it upon himself to try and fix all of the world’s dangers? It seems rather impractical. I also love how Superman and Supergirl are not limited in anyway and seem to have endless powers- even effortless time travel. Also, if the Legion of Superheroes is from the future, why do they have to hurry? They certainly wouldn’t arrive too late. Brainiac 5 is the only character in the comic that seemed logical. It was rather ironic that he is the one questioned about his intentions, be they evil or otherwise. He followed my thoughts of developing a cure in the future and then going back in time. I was also unsure why, if Lana and Lois think Clark Kent is Superman, they don’t they ever try to date him. I thought it was a love triangle of Clark likes Lois, Lois likes Superman, and Superman is indifferent. But perhaps the characters’ interests have evolved from where they originated. All of the extra characters and some of their powers and missions seem rather far fetched. I suppose that that may be the point, however.

I really liked the article by psychologist Fredric Wertham. I never really considered the negative effects comics could have on children, introducing them to violent behaviors. I had assumed that children would not be exposed to the horror and crime genres of comics. Some of the covers we looked at were rather gruesome and disturbing… I wonder if their parents knew what their children were buying. The second point in favor of comics seemed rather ridiculous, that the comics are simply reflecting the children’s minds. It is very difficult to imagine that any child could be so twisted. It seems much more likely that the violence of the comics was a reflection of the writer’s mind. It was also indicated that children do not imitate the behavior in comics. There have many studies done showing that children replicate the violent behavior on television. Looking retrospectively, I think imitation of behavior in comics is very possible. Marston certainly used Wonder Woman to promote and influence the public about a potential matriarchy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Panther's Costume Designer Ruth E. Carter Breaks Down Her Iconic C...

Black Panther's Costume Designer Breaks Down T'Challa's Entrance Scene |...

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.