Skip to main content

In terms of race, do comics offer stereotypes?

Since the beginning of comics, the industry has as a genre not been very diverse in terms of race and ethnicity. Even in the crowds and background of comics the characters were all white, so the chance portray racial stereotypes wasn’t there. Comics began introducing different races slowly starting with having them in the background, and then they began including them as sidekicks. After they were included as sidekicks, there was in 1965, published by Dell Comics, the first black main character of a comic book in Lobo. Although this was a western hero story and only lasted 2 issues, this was significant because of what this said about black characters. The industry could tell by the amount of issues that it lasted that the readers of this time weren’t ready or interested in black characters as a leading role in comics. Taking this into account Marvel Comics decided to introduce a character that they had tried several variations of several times in the past, The New Black Panther. But instead of jumping to give Black Panther his own comic book they put him in a supporting role in Fantastic Four #52 in 1966. But the interesting thing about Black Panther is that his black costume covered his entire body, leaving no skin revealed. Another interesting choice that Marvel made with this character was making him from Africa instead of American. Then after this Marvel introduced another supporting character in 1969 in the Captain America #117, Falcon. Finally in 1972 Marvel Comics introduced the first black superhero with his own series, Luke Cage in Hero For Hire #1. With this character came the stereotype of black people being angry in the 1970s this can be seen by just looking at the cover of the first issue where he is standing in a sort of crouched stance with his fists balled and gritting his teeth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.
2 comments
Read more

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...
1 comment
Read more