Skip to main content

At first, like most people, I thought that comics were just superhero stories and that the format they used involved mostly pictures instead of written descriptions to better show the story. I thought of them as childish picture books and wasn’t really interested in them. Not to say that I didn’t like the stories because that’s just not true. I’m a big fan of marvel superheroes. I just prefer to watch the movies and the televisions shows instead of reading the comic books. With that said, I really found Scott McCloud’s definition of comics to be an interesting way of thinking about it. His definition states that comics are “juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or aesthetic response in the viewer.” This definition makes comics seem much more complicated then what we normally perceive of them. After reading the chapters, I understand comics aren’t just superhero books. In fact comics don’t have anything specifically to do with superheros at all. Comics can be stories of any genre. Superheros are just one of the most popular genres used in comics. The pictures and images in comics are meant to illicit a specific response from the readers. This response is based off of whatever feeling the author of the comic is trying to convey. Unlike in movies, comics aren’t really meant to give a realistic view on things (though there are some comics that have pictures that somewhat resemble reality even though it drawn). I think that comics are meant to feed the imagination of the readers, which is why most comics are more supernatural based. They widen the limited view of reality in the readers mind and let it open up to all the extraordinary possibilities in the world. As humans, we generally tend to want things that would make life more exciting and adventurous for us. This includes things such as having the ability to fly, to read minds, to have super strength, to be able to become invisible etc. Comics let us explore these wants in a more visual way then there would be with just words on a page. However, as I said, that is not only what comic books do. As mentioned in the definition, they are meant to convey information and/or a response from the reader. To me, this means that like any other book, comics are meant to tell a story. Also, since there are many different genres of comics, our imagination does not only expand to supernatural things, but to everyday problems or lifestyles as well. Books also do the same thing but comics do this in a more visual way. For the most part, I think that my understanding of comics have greatly changed since reading “Understanding Comics”. I see now that they are not just childish stories about superheroes but that they are stories that feed the imagination and broadens our views of reality which I think is something that even adults can use in their everyday lives.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle...

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

#FUTURES: Tomorrow Idris Elba will be the Last Man Standing

There is some bad buzz around Pacific Rim on the web. I suspect the possibility of a giant robot movie being awesome is too much for some people.  The internet is full of dark corners, but until we see the movie we won't know the box office.  What we can tell right now is that Idris Elba is doing his part to make the movie a success. A standout performer, Elba has made a name for himself in countless productions .  He achieve wide recognition for his turn on the big screen in films such as Thor and on the small screen in the BBC's Luther . Of course, the open question about actors of color in any film is whether not they will help or hurt the box office.  Will Smith recent disappointment with After Earth opens the door for this conversation. His lack of success sparks the question who will be the next "bankable" star of color. There can be only one! See what I did there:-)  These sentiments reflect a Hollywood centric approach that ignores Nolly...