Skip to main content

How do you understand comics? Most people would look at you as if you were a little “slow” if you asked them this question, and I was one of those people up until a few days ago when I started reading Understanding Comics by Scott McCloud. Before then I would have just told you that comics were just cool little books about superheroes that had more pictures than actual words in it, so there were no questions to be asked about how you understand them. In the book, McCloud clarifies the common misconception that people have about what comics actually are and in doing so actually made understanding comics a lot more challenging. Comics are more than just superhero stories with lots of exciting pictures in them, they are much more complicated than that. The definition for a comic that McCloud gives us in the book opens up a whole new world of graphic media and art that people, including myself, would have never and still do not dare call a comic. After much debate, he defines a comic as “juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response in the viewer.” This definition changed my understanding of comics from a genre of stories to a medium for telling stories just like a movie or a regular book.

With all that said, there is actually a “science” that goes into understanding comics themselves and not just what they are. When trying to understand comics it is important to realize why the characters, objects, and entire scenes are drawn in the manner that they are. It’s not just because the artist thought it would look awesome that way, there was a meaning behind it. Just like when critically analyzing a piece of literature for the author’s use of diction, tone, and scenery it is important to do the same for the pictures and details in comics. For example, when an artist draws a character that is “cartoony," that is to say less realistic, it helps the reader to be able to connect with the character and put him or herself into the story. But, on the other hand, when the artist draws a character in great detail and as realistic as possible, it can help the reader to feel more objective towards that character, whether it be in a good way or a bad way.

After reading the first two chapters of Understanding Comics, I have a new found respect for both comic writers/artists and comics themselves. I also think that as I continue to read on about understanding comics, my ideas about what a comic is and how to understand it will continually be challenged and I will look at comics in a different light than I do now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Comics Ch. 1-2 & Comic Book Nation Ch.1

To begin with, I really do like the idea of reading a comic about comics. I think it's a great idea and it's very well executed. As I was reading the first two chapters, I was surprised at how many examples there were of art in recent (and ancient, in some cases) history that are variations of "sequential visual art" and thus the foundations of modern comics. I'd never even thought about it before and it was hard to believe how many different kinds there were. I also love all the discussion about how our human brains automatically interpret certain images in a specific way, how we see others constantly but we identify ourselves when we look at cartoons, and how inanimate objects automatically becomes extensions of our bodies. The pyramid of styles was very interesting too as a way to conceptualize and almost graph or "place" a specific art style in comics. In Comic Book Nation , I enjoyed reading about the evolution of early comics from "funnies...

MegaCon 2011 Mobile Blog Entry

Next up, the Crime Noir Panel hosted by The Rack Pack Comic Podcast . Jimmy Palmiotti, Frank Tieri, Darwyn Cook and Dave Johnson are the speakers. MegaCon has matured as the comic industry has grown in importance in popular culture. Orlando's native convention should be attracting this kind of top talents and now it seem to be doing it.

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.