Skip to main content

How I Understand Comics.

Comics are understandable because our minds can fill in the missing movements between the segmented pictures we see. Comics use iconic figures, meaning representational images of things from reality. These images are simplified greatly but they are still recognizable and fully representational of an object we are familiar with. These representations can be as simple as a few curved lines making a bow, or as vast as a shaded and colored wall of the Grand Canyon. Recognizing these icons is vital to how comic books can imprint themselves onto us because without being able to simplify the picture, we couldn’t recognize something as simple as and abstract fork. If forced to become entirely lifelike comic books would also be more expensive to make and would therefore never be a viable business idea and would now probably be some sort of underground art movement that only New York and L. A. know about and depict social movements and genocide (think about it).

To understand comics is more difficult than watching television but less difficult then reading a book (McCloud’s implications, not mine). In a novel our imaginations create the characters and build them fully in our own or other peoples images, the sets are loosely based on scenery we’ve experienced or are familiar with. In a comic book, everything is created for us but we can still eject our own impressions on the story. The trick is that because we have a diagram of how the characters are different and the scenery is laid out in front of us it feels easy; our imaginations are working but it feels like a vacation.

Through a mix of realism and impressionism, comics stand on a line between photographs and shapes. The closer to being fully representational they come the more accessible they are (and cheaper to make). Comic book writers can exploit this by making vaguer and therefore more likable protagonists( like Tin Tin or Rorick in Y), causing the reader to unwillingly relate as much as they can by literally picturing themselves as the protagonist. This has been vital to the development of comic books, and is probably one of the keys to how popular they are.

Now, I personally understand comics, pretty much the same way. In fact after reading Scott McCloud’s thoughts on how and why this medium captures its audience, I have been questioning my favorite characters on not only comic books but television shows and novels. I love Michonne from “The Walking Dead” but am I imposing myself onto her image? And does Britney Snow only have career because any blonde girl can see bits of herself in Snow? Thank you McCloud for making me question al my opinions and pre-conceived judgments but I like to think the reason I relate to Michonne is a human conditional thing not necessarily because I see myself in her; I am not a zombie fighting ninja.

Comments

J Chambliss said…
Good analysis, keep it up.

Popular posts from this blog

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle...

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

#FUTURES: Tomorrow Idris Elba will be the Last Man Standing

There is some bad buzz around Pacific Rim on the web. I suspect the possibility of a giant robot movie being awesome is too much for some people.  The internet is full of dark corners, but until we see the movie we won't know the box office.  What we can tell right now is that Idris Elba is doing his part to make the movie a success. A standout performer, Elba has made a name for himself in countless productions .  He achieve wide recognition for his turn on the big screen in films such as Thor and on the small screen in the BBC's Luther . Of course, the open question about actors of color in any film is whether not they will help or hurt the box office.  Will Smith recent disappointment with After Earth opens the door for this conversation. His lack of success sparks the question who will be the next "bankable" star of color. There can be only one! See what I did there:-)  These sentiments reflect a Hollywood centric approach that ignores Nolly...