Skip to main content

I'm sorry for talking about Batman in a Superman post...

I'm sorry if this is a little more opinion then reflection on the readings (which I did do!)...

Soooo... Superman has never been one of my favorite superheroes. It's not that I have any particular problem with him, I was just always more attracted to heroes like the X-Men and Batman who were strong and brave, but also very human and inherently flawed. Batman is dark and brooding and despite Bruce Wayne's charm and charisma, there's always the undeniable sense of a shadow lurking behind the facade.

Superman, on the other hand, is clean-cut and outstanding in every possible way. Not only does he have powers, but he's the model of what a "good man" should be. Batman does what Superman does, but without any powers and while also dealing with a very daunting and traumatic past. Does this mean that Bruce Wayne can't be a good man too...?

When I think about Superman as Clark Kent, I feel like he's more of an imposter then a savior. I can't help remembering that little speech that Bill made at the end of Kill Bill 2 about how Superman is the best hero because he was born extraordinary, and yet also the weakest because, despite his tremendous ability, he lives as a boring, puny human... by choice! I mean, I get the whole thing about protecting his parents and preserving his ability to live among the people that he needs to save, but come on. Did his other self have to be that bland?

Aside from the fact that Superman is an alien (which is definitely a big deal and something that could prove to be mindboggling in itself), there's nothing particularly interesting about him. He's an alien who pretends to be a man, and an unremarkable one at that. At least Bruce Wayne puts on a good show. Superman is a talented actor as well, certainly, but even when he's not acting, he still maintains that perfect goldenboy image and adheres to the same ideals of an almost religious moral principle. His methods aren't debatable, he isn't scrutinized by the law, and he isn't considered a "menace" by some. Everything is done the "right" way and there's never a blemish - Superman is untouchable.

I guess maybe that was what we needed as a country at the time of his creation, but now it all just seems a little too... smooth and shiny, if that makes sense. It's just too perfect.

I have to say though, despite all my griping (and obvious Batman bias :)), I do have a lot of admiration for that glorious, "shining" mythology that surrounds Superman and all of the wonder and awe he instilled in people. He really is the miraculous savior that so many Americans identify with and, through his development and position as one of "us," he was able to connect with Americans in a way that no hero has or may ever be able to again. The infallible goodness endures, even when we feel like we've outgrown it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...

Were comics at the forefront of social transformation or lagging behind in the 1960’s?

Throughout the 60’s, comics were at the forefront of social transformation. Possibly the best example of this is through comics reflection of the public’s view of the Vietnam War. At the beginning of the war a majority of Americans fully supported the cause. The idea that communism, the most evil idea conceived, could spread first through South-East Asia and eventually to the US lead Americans to accept the need to occupy Vietnam. However as the war progressed it became more obvious that it was less to defend democracy and actually just a proxy war against Russia. As support for the war diminished, comics greatly altered their position on the war to question the causes of the war, and whether the US should actually be there. The comic Iron Man accurately represented this shift in support as he stopped dealing arms, and took a moral stand against their use. As well as Vietnam War culture, comics also accurately portrayed youth culture in the US throughout the 60’s. Comics suc...