Skip to main content

An Interview with David Liss


David Liss, the new writer for Black Panther: Man Without Fear, was kind enough to grant me an interview a few weeks back. Just in time for Black History Month, the interview is available at Brink Magazine. Many thanks to William Rosemann and Arune Singh at Marvel Comics for their assistance (including the image you see in this post).

Race and/in comics resonate with contemporary culture. If you have caught the first two issues of Liss' run, you recognize he has incorporated an understanding of post-colonial theory into this run of Black Panther. In some way, the run represents a return to the Black Panther as seminal black figure in Marvel Universe. Black, not African-American, thus the Panther's perspective is that of an outsider divorced from baggage of African-American cultural placement in the United State experience, but is linked to it by the persistence of race based thinking. Like President Obama, the character of T'Challa (the Black Panther's real name) is forever forced into a balancing act. He must reconcile the positive idea and values associated with the American experience, while facing the very real limitation created by race base inequality. If he is too angry, he is not fit to be a hero and the majority will ignore him, if he is not angry enough, he isn't fit to be represent the minority experience and the racial other struggling to be seen will reject him.

At some level, the Black Panther's person has and continues to represent the possibility of what Africa could have been without white colonial influence. This mix of aspiration and inspiration has defined the character's place in the Marvel Universe since Jack Kirby and Stan Lee created him in the midst of the United States' civil right revolution in the 1960s. We cannot deny the character symbolic importance today, even if, we see the problematic desire attached to idea of "representing blackness." One character of African origin cannot express the totality of the African experience any more than one character of African-American heritage can represent every black person in the United States. Regardless, the decision to introduce a black hero in 1966 challenged the Jim Crow racism in comics in much the same way the civil right protesters challenged exclusionary practices in the streets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Comics Ch. 1-2 & Comic Book Nation Ch.1

To begin with, I really do like the idea of reading a comic about comics. I think it's a great idea and it's very well executed. As I was reading the first two chapters, I was surprised at how many examples there were of art in recent (and ancient, in some cases) history that are variations of "sequential visual art" and thus the foundations of modern comics. I'd never even thought about it before and it was hard to believe how many different kinds there were. I also love all the discussion about how our human brains automatically interpret certain images in a specific way, how we see others constantly but we identify ourselves when we look at cartoons, and how inanimate objects automatically becomes extensions of our bodies. The pyramid of styles was very interesting too as a way to conceptualize and almost graph or "place" a specific art style in comics. In Comic Book Nation , I enjoyed reading about the evolution of early comics from "funnies...

MegaCon 2011 Mobile Blog Entry

Next up, the Crime Noir Panel hosted by The Rack Pack Comic Podcast . Jimmy Palmiotti, Frank Tieri, Darwyn Cook and Dave Johnson are the speakers. MegaCon has matured as the comic industry has grown in importance in popular culture. Orlando's native convention should be attracting this kind of top talents and now it seem to be doing it.

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.