Skip to main content

How have we changed our definition of the comic form over time?

While the comic (as we know it today) might be a fairly 20th century invention, comics have existed for thousands of years. Whether in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, cave paintings in Lascaux, France, or Victorian England, the comic has continued to evolve. In today's society, frames, gutters, word bubbles, icons, symbols, etc. have become the basis for constructing comics.

While the basic construction is the same, comics have evolved from their cave painting ancestors. Cave paintings and early "comics" were focused on depicting rituals, hunts, etc. However, what these early comics and modern comics have in common is the very basis of Scott McCloud's definition of comics: "juxtaposed pictorial[s] and other images in deliberate sequence." In addition to the very definition of the comic medium, the idea of preserving history in words and pictures has continued.

Each comic demonstrates a different segment of history: social, economic, cultural, etc. Whether it be drug use in the 1970's (Green Lantern and Green Arrow), racial inequality in the 60's, greed in the 30's, or hunting Mammoths in prehistoric time, comics have always depicted some aspect of life that becomes part of a written history.

Another change in the evolution of comics is the interaction between words and pictures. In early comics, there were no words, and when they were included in later centuries, the two were separate pieces. In modern comics, the words and pictures are interchangeable. Comics live and die off of the story and art. Without great art, a comic is a novel. Without a great story, the comic is a picture book. Comics artists and writers maximize meaning by deciding the role of a word bubble or an onomatopoeia in electric colors and designs, or the size and shape of a panel, or the construction of the closure between panels. Comics have become as much about the gutter as they have about the actual panels themselves.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.
2 comments
Read more

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle...
2 comments
Read more

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...
1 comment
Read more