Skip to main content

Doctor Who: The Coming of The War Doctor


  

The drum beat to the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who grows ever louder. Still this particular short film addresses a question I've had about Doctor Who for a long time.  As I consider the impact of superhero in a global context, Doctor Who strikes me as singular example of an organic creation of a  superhero archtype in different cultural context.  Doctor Who, based on the definition of the superhero defined by Peter Coogan in his book, Superhero: The Secret Origins of A Genre, is a superhero. As Coogan explains, the superhero acts as an orienting figure that resolves conflicts and contradictions. Furthermore,  Coogan argues mission, powers, identity, and costume are the elements that distinguish the superhero from other kinds of heroes. A careful examination of the Doctor demonstrates that the character has all of these elements.  The Doctor's adventures since 1963 have offered a global audience a vision of superhero cast within the cultural landscape of the United Kingdom.  This reading of the character provides rich opportunities to understand the evolution of the British experience since 1963.  This is why the 50th anniversary is important for scholars as much as fans.  

 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCGMTLFQwSZsfLYhIOC1VFsoXptFPdcgAHIG9P_87LrPbDtAcOvkvKRFkfvHStXKsOGzpkUeH1TlfDHHFAF90OZ1fxhZgiTyprgDtBhk2EZcA5GZsukpUkWRlH47HieP2YfMzArbzO_Y4/s1600/SaveTheDay.jpg


In recent years the BBC has recognized Doctor Who as global brand and moved to leverage the program global awareness into a marketing bonanza.  This has meant the different elements of a diverse Doctor Who fandom that include everything from radio plays to fan fiction has evaluated. Some elements have been made a part of the "canon" other elements have not.  One element that has been included is the 1996 Doctor Who telefilm produced by Fox Television. This film, an attempt to revive the series after its cancellation in 1989, was not well received. Although, I recently saw an excellent paper at  Walking in Eternity: The Doctor Who 50th Anniversary Conference by Mark Aldridge that argued this film established many elements that would be common in the 2005 reboot.  The film is notable because we see Sylvester McCoy (the seventh doctor) regenerate into Paul McGann (the 8th Doctor).

Regeneration, the means by which the Doctor escapes death, allows for different actors to take on the role of the Doctor. It also acts as symbolic renewal of the cultural agency represented by the character. As writer and script editor Terrance Dicks explained, “Doctor Who is like a saga. Every few year there will be a new something. There will be a new companion. There will be new writers. There will be new script editors.  There will be new producers. And every chunk of years there will be a new Doctor. So all of these things bring change, which is absolutely to the good. Of course when Barry Letts and I left and Philip Hinchcliffe and Bob Holmes did it slightly differently, we went around mumbling ‘things aren’t what they were in the old days’. But they shouldn’t be, and now that John Nathan-Turner and his script editor Eric Saward have taken over, they will do it differently, and it is quite right that they should. They should not do it the way I would do it. that is the whole point. And I think that is really the answer to what has kept Doctor Who alive - it’s this continuos input.

The problem (if you wish to see it), is that we don't witness the regeneration into Christopher Eccleston's Doctor in the 2005 reboot.  Rather than contend with the complexity of decades of back story, the reboot's first season assumed you knew nothing of Doctor Who.  This allowed a complex and frustrating narrative to be introduced to a new generation of fans.  In the second year of the reboot, it became clear that the new Doctor was in fact, part of the same narrative universe of the 1963 series.  Indeed, elements of the story created on different platforms (books and radio plays) were incorporated into the canon by Russell T. Davies. This new Doctor survived the Time War, which happened between the 1996 telefilm and beginning of the 2005 revival of the television series.  While fans can assume that the Doctor regenerated during this period, it has not been known how many times it happen. Now, with the release of the "Night of the Doctor" we are given a glimpse of the events of the Time War and a new regeneration of the Doctor in the form of John Hurt's War Doctor.  The reality of Doctor created for war is a new and in some ways startling addition to the mythology associated with Doctor Who.  The Doctor has always been a man seeking peace, but willing to fight. Now, in the 50th anniversary story we will see a character made to fight who, in turn, will affirm the need to seek peace.  A telling message for our contemporary debates about war and conflict.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Comics Ch. 1-2 & Comic Book Nation Ch.1

To begin with, I really do like the idea of reading a comic about comics. I think it's a great idea and it's very well executed. As I was reading the first two chapters, I was surprised at how many examples there were of art in recent (and ancient, in some cases) history that are variations of "sequential visual art" and thus the foundations of modern comics. I'd never even thought about it before and it was hard to believe how many different kinds there were. I also love all the discussion about how our human brains automatically interpret certain images in a specific way, how we see others constantly but we identify ourselves when we look at cartoons, and how inanimate objects automatically becomes extensions of our bodies. The pyramid of styles was very interesting too as a way to conceptualize and almost graph or "place" a specific art style in comics. In Comic Book Nation , I enjoyed reading about the evolution of early comics from "funnies...

MegaCon 2011 Mobile Blog Entry

Next up, the Crime Noir Panel hosted by The Rack Pack Comic Podcast . Jimmy Palmiotti, Frank Tieri, Darwyn Cook and Dave Johnson are the speakers. MegaCon has matured as the comic industry has grown in importance in popular culture. Orlando's native convention should be attracting this kind of top talents and now it seem to be doing it.

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.