Skip to main content

The Death of the Human Torch and the Rebirth of the Brand


The death of Johnny Storm in this week's Fantastic Four #587 isn't the end of Johnny Storm, but it is a new least on life for the media franchise. For all the attention Marvel movies have gotten in recent years, people have all but ignored the Fantastic Four less than stellar outing in the movie theaters. Those films, Fantastic Four (2005) and Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007) much like Hulk (2003) all predate Iron Man (2008) firmly setting the foundation for the Marvel cinematic Universe.

I know it might seem strange to think about the death of Human Torch in terms of the film franchise, but comics are in the midst of synergistic media convergence. Owned, as the two major superhero comic publisher are, by major media conglomerates the space between the imagined story on the page and the cinematic re-interpretation is shrinking. The decision to make a change in the comic can and will be capitalized on film. The death of the Human Torch, draws media attention. Naturally, that attention is unlike the geektastic media coverage. No, a death pushes out of the niche media market and into a broad cultural discussion.

People will rightly go over the character's long history, they will talk about what the comic represents, and ask what does it all mean. They will probably talk about major storylines, villains, and characters. People who haven't read the comic in twenty or thirty years will take note. Better, they might buy the comic or share their memory of the comic with their kids. Sales of trades collecting classic stories will likely get a boost and everyone will think about the Fantastic Four. A new rebranded comic will debut with issue #1 in short order and that will also add to sales. What better time for people curious about the recent death to check it out. Number one issues sell well. For old fans, the question of how Johnny will come back to life (and when) will likely draw readers.

The real benefit however is for the branding. For non-comic reading public, a rebooted and redesigned Fantastic Four movie must be coming. This is perfect time to re-introduce the Fantastic Four into the cinematic universe. The FF has always been Marvel's first family. Stan Lee and Jack Kirby built the Marvel universe on the back of the Fantastic Four. While the tagline, "World Greatest Comic Magazine" may seem strange to readers today, it made sense in the 1960s when the Fantastic Four debuted. Reed Richards--Mr. Fantastic, Susan Storm--Invisible Girl (later Invisible Woman), Johnny Storm--the Human Torch and Ben Grimm--The Thing were and are a family. The Fantastic Four were more adventurers than superheroes, they challenge the unknown. More than that, the Fantastic Four provided strong pro-American and anti-communist messages. The accident that gave the powers was all about the space race. Reed needed to test his new rocket so he could beat the Russian to the moon. Reed Richards was a scientist working to make sure the United States ahead of our communist enemies (the USSR). The rest of the crew fit neatly into nuclear family mold. Susan was destined to be maternal figure. While Ben and Johnny were both emotionally immature in different ways. For all the success of the early years, the Fantastic Four hasn't been at the forefront of Marvel Comics for years. Spider-Man, the X-Men, and the Avengers all sold better. The Fantastic Four was more nostalgic in its importance than drawing new readers. The new run by Jonathan Hickman follows a run by Mark Millar that put new energy in the comic. Hickman especially developed the family emphasis with greater care, giving Reed Richard and Susan Storm's kids more to do. He has built up all the characters, so this death will have a big impact in the book and in the readers.

Beyond that fact however, Marvel doesn't seem to be missing a beat when it comes to media convergence. So, it makes sense that we will hear about the new Fantastic Four movie coming. This new movie can once again put the focus on the important ideas that are core to the FF brand. A scientist as hero is exactly what President Obama's push for U.S. education and innovation needs. Moreover, Republicans can grab on to the idea of a "family" of heroes working together to make the country better. It so perfect it hurts. There are some dangers that a return to Cold War paradigm will easily lend themselves to China as jingoistic bad guy in this new 21st century race for economic success, but that kind of story won't be in the comic book directly.

Given the amount of time it take to develop movies, I suspect we will see this new Fantastic Four movie just in time for Johnny Storm to come back from the dead. There is no rush, Marvel has a long slate of character making their way to the big and small screen. I'm thinking three years should do it. From a comic standpoint that is a long time and remember Captain America only stayed dead about three years.

I think Jonathan Hickman is a great writer for the Fantastic Four. He is a mix of great character work and fantastic concepts. So, his emphasis on the Fantastic Four as family, and his willingness to put that family dynamic under stress will keep readers interested. Still, there is product to be sold and money to be made. Whatever his plans may be, you can bet the Disney marketing machine will capitalize on it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle...

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...