Skip to main content

Arrogant sexist superman, defeats boring sexist villains.

I found the superman comic to be much different that I had originally thought of it. The Superman conveyed in the movies or the one I had always pictured was much more polite than the original Superman, who seems to be a bit arrogant.  An instant of his arrogance is perfectly depicted when he carries the governors assistant up the stairs to the governor because the assistant will not take him to the governor.  Superman therefore picks up the assistant and carries him to the bedroom of the governor.  Superman apparently does not take NO for an answer.  This idea becomes even more interesting when comparing Superman to his other self, of Clark Kent, who has no guts and is a pushover.  

I also noticed that the story-line seemed to change quiet a bit throughout the comic, there did not seem to be one main villain or evil plan that Superman must stop; instead there seems to be a series of different small events and stories within the one comic book.  There is the plot of Superman going to the jail and simply being told by a prisoner that he is innocent and that a certain woman is the actual murderer.  I thought this whole idea was a bit bogus, I mean there was no evidence that this woman committed the crime, until she blurted it out and tried to attack Superman.  Haha she had no idea what she had coming.  Then there is the lobbyist doing insider work, which has no relation to the other stories in this comic edition.  Also there is the issue of domestic violence that Superman takes care of.  While the abuser is doing wrong, he is not exactly an exciting villain. There does not seem to be any competition for Superman, no great villain who he must truly struggle against.  Where have all the cool villains gone? In another small plot, the man who demands Lois dance with him,  kidnaps her, only to be visited soon after by Superman, who has come to rescue the prisoner.  

Which brings me to another point;  the women in comics are portrayed in a sexist manner.  Lois apparently cannot take care of herself as well as she thought she could, and needs a man to rescue her as did  the woman whose husband was beating her.  "You're not fighting a woman , now", Superman exclaims as he punches the abusive husband, stating that women are easier to fight than a man, or a "Superman".  The women are also referred to in a derogatory manner, "I'll show that skirt she can't make a fool of Butch Matson!" The word skirt is quiet derogatory, as it is stating that a woman is a mere thing, a piece of clothing.  I think this is awful, but considering the person saying it is a villain, who is automatically associated with wrong doings, it makes it less offensive.  However if a non villain, such as Superman or another good super-hero had used that word to refer to a woman I promise that while it might not have been an issue then, it would definitely be one now.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why blame comics for societal failure?

Why blame comics for societal failure? Society blamed comics for the societal failures because it was a fairly new industry, and as things seemed to go “wrong” they figured it must be comic books. When a child grew up during the war, his father was probably killing people and the military and his mother was probably making things in factories to help kill the opposition. The only things kids had to “babysit” them was comic books, and they read many different kinds. So when kids starting acting differently in this new generation the figured it must be the comic books. Society didn’t want to believe it may have been the internal and external scars war causes on the soldiers and their families. Also the fact that young unattended children are reading these comics may not be able to differentiate between fantasy and reality. When society fails it always needs a scapegoat then it was comic books next it was rock and roll. Society naturally resist change.

Mythology and Superheroes in Comics

Ohhh my goodness... When I decided on trying to analyze the mythological origins and references in superhero comics, I had no idea the can of worms I was opening up... On the one hand, it was awesome to see just how many connections there were between superheroes and psychology/mythology/philosophy, but all the information also made it terribly difficult to distinguish what I should be using and how to tie it all together. When I was talking to one of my sorority sisters about it she said, "Oh yeah, well, research essays are kind of like putting together puzzles..." and I think that really sums up what writing this paper was like for me. Fortunately, I was really interested throughout the whole process and I very much enjoyed writing the paper. Being a psychology major, I was especially interested in reading about the Jungian archetypes that had a lot of parallels with major modern comic books superheroes. I was also able to incorporate Joseph Campbell's "hero cycle...

The 1950s are often portrayed as a period of social cohesion. Why is this misleading?

When we think of the 1950's, most people think of similar things such as "Leave it to Beaver", very conservative and cliched pop music, and high patriotism. Our view of that time is one of social conformity to conservative values, with a traditional nuclear family where the father worked and the mother stayed home, where a majority of people attended church, where crime was relatively low, where a majority of American citizens were extremely patriotic, and where entertainment media emphasized these same conservative values and were subjected to censorship if they did not conform. This is misleading because while these things were all true to a certain extent, the world was obviously not perfect and not everyone was conforming or upholding traditional values, even if it seemed like they were. The 1950's were actually a very tumultuous time period, with the end of World War II leaving Europe war torn and in debt, the outbreak of the Korean War and the clashes of opinion...